Old vs New Regime? Computed Side-by-Side.
Model regime comparisons, optimise deduction strategies, plan capital-gains timing, and compute advance-tax liability. Grounded in the actual provisions of the IT Act 1961, the IT Act 2025 (Sec. 202 ↔ Sec. 115BAC), and the latest Finance Act 2025 slab revisions.
The dual-regime system forces CAs to run parallel computations for every client. A salaried individual with HRA, 80C, 80D, home-loan interest and NPS contributions may save more under the old regime, or may not. Getting it wrong means the client either overpays tax or faces scrutiny for an incorrect regime election. Add capital gains from property sales, ESOP exercises and mutual-fund redemptions — and the planning matrix becomes unwieldy without structured computation.
A real question, a cited answer
Every claim above traces to a primary source in our knowledge base
How TaxMarg helps
Old vs New Regime Comparison
Input the client's income profile and deductions. TaxMarg computes tax liability under both regimes using the FA 2025 revised slabs (new) and the unchanged pre-2020 slabs (old), applies the Sec. 87A rebate (₹60K / ₹12L under new, ₹12.5K / ₹5L under old), and shows the exact break-even deduction level where one regime becomes more favourable.
Capital Gains Optimisation
Model the tax impact of selling assets at different times. See how holding period affects STCG vs LTCG treatment (24 months for unlisted shares post FA (No.2) 2024), how the Sec. 112A grandfathering works for listed equity acquired before 01-02-2018, and how harvesting losses under Sections 70 / 71 can offset gains across asset classes.
Advance Tax & Due-Date Planning
Compute quarterly advance-tax instalments under Sec. 210 based on projected income. Get alerts for the 15% / 45% / 75% / 100% quarterly thresholds under Sec. 211, interest implications under Sections 234B and 234C for shortfall, and the Sec. 207 exemption for senior citizens without business income.
Structured, exportable output
Try these questions
Related use cases